It's time to stand up to blind patriotic rhetoric Susie Dorsey April 11 2004 Many of us who think religion is a very personal and private thing stood by silently and let a vocal group redefine the religious community in this country. They not only did it in the name of Christianity, thus excluding many citizens, but they routinely invoke their religion in matters governmental. They have tried to eliminate the separation of their church and the state, and would, except for the constitutional provision to the contrary, bring religion into every aspect of government. We often refer to these people as the religious right. And while I'm not sure that all of the players are the same, there certainly is a huge overlap between the religious right and the group that is now trying to redefine patriotism. It's time for each of us to stand up and be counted instead of cowering under the threat of venomous rhetoric that is currently being launched at anyone who dares criticize the government. The past year's events in Iraq have given rise to this latest demagoguery. Here's the problem: There's a group in this country that confuses patriotism with their own sense of what's right. And what's right, as a general rule, is what the man they supported for president says is right. Going to war in Iraq was right, and anyone who dares to criticize that war is unpatriotic. They take any argument against the war and cast it as an aspersion on the country and on the men and women in the U.S. military who are fighting the war. Any criticism of President Bush specifically or the government's role in general, they will say, is disrespectful of the men and women who have died. Do they believe this stuff, or are they just trying to browbeat the rest of us into silent submission? No one wants to tell a recent widow that her husband died for nothing. On the other hand, no one should feel unpatriotic if they disagreed from the outset and felt that going to war in Iraq was a diversion from the hunt for Osama bin Laden. Nor should they feel unpatriotic if they have, even slowly and painfully over the months, come to believe the Bush administration exaggerated the facts and deceived us about some of the reasons for going to war. But just as many in this group can't conceive of government that is not based on their religious beliefs, neither can they see any reason to tolerate people who believe true patriotism can abide legitimate criticism. That's too bad, because this is beginning to have the tenor of the early days of dissension about the war in Vietnam when any critic was cursed and reviled. How can we ever correct a bad situation - whether it was the Vietnam War, the current war and occupation in Iraq or any other problem - if we can't discuss the pros and cons, admit mistakes were made, correct them and move on? No president, no administration, is ever going to be perfect. Some suggest that the Bush administration is setting new records for blunders, but for the purpose of this discussion, I'm willing to say that's just political sniping. I am less tolerant of people who refuse to take seriously the words of former treasurer Paul O'Neill and terrorism expert Richard Clarke just because they are critical of Bush. And while I am not a fan of John Kerry, I am offended when this group of armchair warriors tries to label his Vietnam War protests as unpatriotic. After all, the man risked his life in Vietnam. He had firsthand knowledge of what was going on. And these Johnny-come-latelies are going to question his patriotism because they don't like some of the other people in the anti-war movement. But this isn't about John Kerry. This is about people who have made up their minds, closed them to any new facts and feel justified in demeaning anyone who doesn't agree with them. We are in for a long, rough war in this country. But let's make it a war against terrorism, a war for the hearts and minds of the world instead of a war with one another over who is a true patriot. Dorsey is a former associate editor of the editorial page. Send e-mail to susiedorsey@cox.net. Copyright © 2004, Daily Press